And at the press conference, one member of the group, Elizabeth Dena, made some radical threats to shut down testing locations and to stage protests, both of which pose multiple public health dangers. Today, we asked one of the executive members, Zenaida Moya, about this. She agreed that it was extreme and that they aren't promoting such drastic measures. Another member, attorney Arthur Saldivar, said they will be taking their case to the court.
Zenaida Moya, Member, BJRM
"I don't subscribe to it, I am a pro-choice. And I believe that people have a right to go ahead and choose in this era. Go ahead and choose, you want to go that route, go that route. That's not on any of us. She feel strongly about it and that her. What I want to say we have some individuals that are extremely passionate about what they are talking about. There don't have to be any shutdown, there don't have to be any protests, there don't have to be any boycott, there don't have to be any sickout - there don't have to be anything that was mentioned by that person. If they only say you know what I heard you."
Reporter
"If all fails, be prepared for civil disobedience at the magnitude as never before experience in this land and would never again experience since all the tyrants will flee."
Arthur Saldivar, Attorney
"The impetus behind the movement that was created was to challenge all these things in a court of law. If, in the court of law tyrants flee, then that is the method that we will use. Within the parameters of law everything will be done."
They plan to challenge SI 74 and will be filing their claim by August 1st.
